https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6027
way...@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #5 from way...@samba.org 2009-02-04 20:30 CST ------- The thing I dislike about both my patch and yours is that it stops the receiving side from removing a symlink that shouldn't be there just because it has a 0-length value. Because of this, I moved the check to where it would only affect the sending of the file list to the receiver. I have checked in a fix to prevent a fatal error for a 0-length symlink. As for you comment #3, I am missing what you are driving at. If readlink() doesn't work on a symlink, how can something read the link to follow it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html