https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6027
way...@samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #5 from way...@samba.org 2009-02-04 20:30 CST -------
The thing I dislike about both my patch and yours is that it stops the
receiving side from removing a symlink that shouldn't be there just because it
has a 0-length value. Because of this, I moved the check to where it would
only affect the sending of the file list to the receiver.
I have checked in a fix to prevent a fatal error for a 0-length symlink.
As for you comment #3, I am missing what you are driving at. If readlink()
doesn't work on a symlink, how can something read the link to follow it?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
