Thanks Matt but I think that should not be a correct behavior. The rsync should retry the ESTALE files rather than giving errors immediately and deleting the files untimely.
Jignesh. On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Matt McCutchen <m...@mattmccutchen.net>wrote: > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 15:49 +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: > > Hi, I am wondering how rsync-3.0.6 react if it encounters ESTALE error > > while synching? If I remember correctly then the rsync-2.6.0 skipping > > that file/dir in case of ESTALE error. > > If rsync encounters any kind of error reading a source file, it will > report the error (causing an eventual exit code of 23) and skip the > actual update to the destination file, unless --inplace was specified, > in which case the update has already been done. A second rsync run will > clean up any mess resulting from untimely deletion of source files. > > -- > Matt > >
-- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
