https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6916
------- Comment #2 from [email protected] 2009-11-27 23:57 CST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The only thing for rsync to potentially do is to have a build option for using > a compatible, shared zlib. What happened to, "Tridge has mentioned to me that he thinks the slight savings in compression wasn't really worth all the hassle, so some future version of rsync may get rid of this optimization and start to use the system's zlib"? http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-December/014180.html I'm not saying that is definitely the right decision, just that it deserves fair consideration. > If fedora patched their version of zlib with the Z_INSERT_ONLY support, it > should (presumably) be usable by normal zlib apps, and rsync as well. The Fedora folks don't wish to be maintain the patched zlib themselves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495310#c7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
