On Friday 11 December 2009 18:49:54 you wrote: > On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:04 +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: > > On Friday 11 December 2009 03:43:30 you wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 01:25 +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: > > > > I don't know what I'm doing bad, but --link-dest does not work for me: > > [...] > > > > > > Pass -i to find out why rsync didn't use the file from copy1. There > > > might be a difference in the seconds part of the mtime, which would not > > > show up in the "ls" output. > > > > > > > $ rsync -avi --link-dest=$PWD/copy1 origin/ copy2 > > sending incremental file list > > .d..t...... ./ > > >f..t...... kk > > > > sent 104 bytes received 35 bytes 278.00 bytes/sec > > total size is 3 speedup is 0.02 > > > > I do not understand that output > > The output format of -i is described in the man page. The "t" indicates
Found it, but didn't understood well. > that copy1/kk differs from origin/kk in modification time, which > disqualifies it from being linked since you asked rsync to preserve > modification time as part of -a. > Ok, now I understand. Let's go to the explaining: I'm trying to use --link-dest on NTFS, particularly on ntfs-3g on Linux. It does not work and now I know why: files differ on permissions since ntfs-3g does not handle them. Many thanks to all and particularly to Matt Noel er Envite
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
