On 5/15/2013 5:17 AM, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 15 May 2013, Brian K. White wrote:
Consider the following directory structure
/foo/aaa/*/*
/foo/bbb/*/*
/foo/ccc/*/*
I want to sync all of /foo,
but exclude /foo/aaa
rsync -avz /foo ${DEST}::root
Firstly, I always recommend that with directory transfers you add a
trailing slash to the source, so your command becomes:
rsync -avz /foo/ ${DEST}::root/foo/
Then a filter would be:
- /aaa/
+ /*
Note the leading slash, as your aaa directory is now in the root of the
source. The second line is not really needed in this scenario IMHO
To be honest I'm wondering about your usage of -f ". filter",
I always do --exclude-from=filter
> rsync -avz /foo/ ${DEST}::root/foo/
This syntax does work in his case, and is easier to read, because it
ends up using the exact same specification "/foo/" and "/foo/" for both
source and dest, but the syntax I had was also correct. I no longer
remember why I always do the way I posted, but I've been doing it that
way for decades (if you count rcp before rsync).
It might be that the way I did it _always_ works as expected, where this
way maybe doesn't work as expected in some cases, like maybe if the
source is a file named /foo/aaa, so you use "/foo/aaa" the same in both
the source and dest, but the dest machine happens to have a directory
named /foo/aaa, then instead of having the dest directory converted to a
file to match the source, the file from the source would be placed
_within_ the directory on the dest, creating a file named /foo/aaa/aaa
instead of /foo/aaa on dest. So, I'd rather, it's safer to do something
the same way every time and know that it works the same way every time
where possible. If you manually remove the trailing path component from
the dest, then it always works the same way regardless if source is a
file or dir and regardless if dest already has a file or dir of the same
name. You follow the same exact rule every time and get the same exact
result every time. No unpleasant surprises.
The -f ". filename" syntax is correct it's right in the manual and I've
been using it for ages.
You're right the leading slash in the exclude pattern was the key in
this case.
--
bkw
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
