Sorry to keep replying to myself: > Because this is a Time Machine backup, and there were 66 snapshots of a > 1 TB disk consuming about 1.5 TB, there were a *lot* of hard links. Many > of directories rather than individual files, so it's a little
Err, whoops? No, I was tired and confused. They are not hard links to directories, that would screw up the universe. Still, lots of hard linked files. > Do I need to run this under lldb and set a breakpoint in expand_item_list()? > Quick inspection suggests running with -vvvv might give some useful output: Err... the result of this was it processed a few files for a minute or so and then hung in select() and consumed no cpu and there was no disk activity. Unfortunately apparently my clang/lldb workflow was broken and I didn't have functional debugging symbols (...) and I also lost the stack trace I thought I had (inadequate scrollback), so I'm not sure what was going on. But at first blush, it appeared that adding -vvvv made things hang forever. Removing it, and rerunning, it's now happily trucking along and has been for the past hour actually doing work. --jh...@mit.edu John Hawkinson -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
