Todd, What are those loss in running rsync-stunnel as compared to rsync-over-ssh that you mentioned here ?? tell me more about "slung behind a stunnel" -----Original Message----- From: Bennett Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 2:16 PM To: Sanjeev Jha Cc: Rsync-us4 (E-mail) Subject: Re: port 2000-09-26-12:56:20 Sanjeev Jha: > This might be discussed already, if yes, let me repeat it to clear my doubt. > > I think there is nothing like "SSL enable port for rsync" yet. Is there any > plan in future ? Just want to get idea about this. An rsync --daemon could be slung behind a stunnel, if you really wanted to go to the effort. But there's no benefit, and some loss of functionality, compared to the classing rsync-over-ssh. Someone else on this list recently posted their experiences trying to run rsync over stunnel; you could look for that. If you have trouble turning it up email me and I'll dig it out of my archives. -Bennett
