Is this the overall consensus on this list? If so, I'll revert the change in the next release. So if you don't like this, please comment now.
Thanks, Rainer ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----- Von: "Michael Biebl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "rsyslog-users" <[email protected]> Gesendet: 02.10.07 18:34 Betreff: Re: [rsyslog] rsyslog 1.19.8 released 2007/10/2, Rainer Gerhards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > You can split up the build to create multiple *binary* packages from a > > single *source* package, the RPM format as well as DEB allows that. > > > > Actually the Debian and Fedora packages already do that. The rsyslog > > [1] binary package contains the core rsyslogd/rklogd binaries, the > > rsyslog-mysql [2] package the mysql output plugin. > > It's not necessary to already split up the *source* package for that. > > That sounds exactly like what I would love to have. However, I am no But that is already possible with a single source tarball as we had with <= 1.19.7. That's why I questioned the need for the source package split. Am I missing something? > autotools expert. If you (or someone else) can lend me a helping hand in > creating the necessary config files for autotools, I will gladly do it > in that way. I'd say, just ship a single tarball as in <= 1.19.7 and let the distributions decide how they split up the package into (multiple) binary packages. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
