> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Biebl > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 8:49 PM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] rsyslog/syslog-ng comparison > > 2008/1/30, Rainer Gerhards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi all, > > > > I have added a rsyslog vs. syslog-ng feature comparison sheet to the > doc > > set: > > > > http://www.rsyslog.com/doc-rsyslog_ng_comparison.html > > > > I would appreciate if those familiar with syslog-ng's features (I am > > not!) could have a look at it and tell me which bullet points are > > missing. I try to get an as good comparison as possible and > specifically > > would like to see features listed that rsyslog is currently lacking. > > Also, because I'll see if/when I can implement them. As such, I would > > also appreciate your personal opinion on how important a missing > feature > > is. > > The feature to include config files based on name, directory or wild > cards is missing in the list ;-)
Could I miss this feature? ;) Well, I thought it is added by this bullet point: "config file includes, also full directory includes" But that is probably a bit cryptic. Will see that I change the text. And while we are at it: would a similar directive for $ModLoad make sense (easy, but a bit doubtful from security perspective, malicious users could just simply drop a Trojan on the well-known location and know it'll get activated by rsyslogd on next system startup...). Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
