> > Question now: does anybody actually need this feature? If so, why is > it > good? > > Please provide feedback. Hi all,
i think it's a biest of the past, remember those days where every byte, every bit was really valuable? i remember programing on my C64 with byte values, because they could hold 256 states and it was just using one (!, today i have to smile) byte ... Or the times i had my first 40 MB Harddrive in one of my first PC's ... i guess compressing a message which is exactly the same but only of the timestamp was virtually a lifesaver those days ... as far as i can say, from the bottom of my heart: get rid of it! disc- space is cheap, i *love* consistant logs, personally i can not think of any answer that would justify today a) log-file inconsinstency b) a known trouble-spot and c) such a future-development-stopper as this code seems to be (after reading your problems with this piece of code. again, from me: go for it best Raimund > > > Thanks, > Rainer > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
