Andre,

So do you think we should add this to the standard schema? I am a bit
hesitant, as not all folks will probably want that and it keeps backward
compatibility. Maybe it is better to just us a standard name but not
include it in the standard schema.

What do you (and others) think?

Rainer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Lorbach
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:37 AM
> To: rsyslog-users
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
> 
> I think this would be possible yes, we need to define a common name
for
> the database and property field in rsyslog, then we can start adding
> support for it in phplogcon.
> 
> regards,
> Andre
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mikel
> > Sent: Dienstag, 18. November 2008 21:06
> > To: rsyslog-users
> > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
> >
> >
> > Dear Andre
> >
> > So, in near future will be possible?
> >
> > Or in far future?
> >
> > Thanx
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:00:04 +0100, "Rainer Gerhards"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Andre and all,
> > >
> > > the rsyslog engine has the necessary plumbing and I know of at
> least
> > one
> > > user who stores subsecond timestamps in this way. As far as
rsyslog
> > is
> > > concerned, this just requires a special timestamp. So if you would
> > > support that in phpLogCon (what I would find a good idea ;)), I
> would
> > > include a standard template into rsyslog (hardcoded). That would
> make
> > it
> > > easier for people to work with it. But maybe we get along by just
> > > properly documenting it, because the schema must be modified in
any
> > > case.
> > >
> > > Another alternative would be to update the default schema, but I
am
> > not
> > > sure it that is actually a good idea. On the other hand, high-
> > precision
> > > timestamps hopefully get into more widespread use...
> > >
> > > Thoughts from the community are appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rainer
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Lorbach
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:56 PM
> > >> To: rsyslog-users
> > >> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
> > >>
> > >> I think it wouldn't be so difficult to implement, if the
> > milliseconds
> > >> were simply stored in a second field.
> > >> We can add custom new fields into phpLogCon very easily.
> > >>
> > >> best regards,
> > >> Andre Lorbach
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards
> > >> > Sent: Dienstag, 18. November 2008 16:39
> > >> > To: rsyslog-users
> > >> > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi Mikel,
> > >> >
> > >> > I have talked to Andre, phpLogCon's lead developer. He says
> MySQL
> > >> does
> > >> > not support millisecond resolution in timestamps. So a
> work-around
> > >> > would
> > >> > be to store them to another field and add this as a second
field
> > to
> > >> the
> > >> > phpLogCon view. I think it would probably smart to enable
> > phpLogCon
> > >> to
> > >> > combine two such fields, but I leave this to Andre...
> > >> >
> > >> > Rainer
> > >> >
> > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mikel Jimenez
> > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:10 PM
> > >> > > To: rsyslog-users
> > >> > > Subject: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hello
> > >> > > I am using phplogcon viewer and I have loosed milliseconds
> > >> > timestamps.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I watched that "DATE" in mysql databases is date-time type.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Does rsyslog gives the date in milliseconds? is possible to
> see
> > >> this
> > >> > > milliseconds din phplogcon?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Mikel Jimenez Fernandez
> > >> > > Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX -
> > >> http://www.irontec.com
> > >> > > +34 94.404.81.82
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > rsyslog mailing list
> > >> > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > >> > > http://www.rsyslog.com
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > rsyslog mailing list
> > >> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > >> > http://www.rsyslog.com
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> rsyslog mailing list
> > >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > >> http://www.rsyslog.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rsyslog mailing list
> > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > > http://www.rsyslog.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsyslog mailing list
> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > http://www.rsyslog.com
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to