W dniu 11.10.2010 14:21, Rainer Gerhards pisze:
> I could probably remove that from the hash
> table code that I use, but so far I found it useful (and the extra overhead
> should not really be noticable, I thought).

This is quite drastic solution;) Isn't there another way?
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to