On 5/31/11 11:56 PM, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rory Toma
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 8:55 AM
To: rsyslog-users
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Question on host failover
I need to check, but I believe that may be an issue. I'll have to check my
kernel/toolchain, and the configure output. I know there was a time frame
when stable rsyslog did not compile due to this issue, and then I assumed
that it had been removed when it started to compile again. I'll check
tomorrow.
Well, I and others have done quite some work on the atomics replacements, and
they should work and work reasonably efficient in the current builds.
However, this is not used very often, and this is why I immediately consider
this as a region to look at...
Rainer
So, I run this:
<stuff>
*.* @@rsyslog:110
$ActionExecOnlyWhenPreviousIsSuspended on
& @@rsyslog:143
$ActionExecOnlyWhenPreviousIsSuspended off
in debug mode. I see a whole bunch of stuff at startup, and then
nothing. Hopefully it's not trying to syslog the debug output... 8-)
From a tcpdump on my firewall, I see it trying to hit the first one,
and not the second.
It looks like I do have atomic support in the compiler:
checking whether the compiler provides atomic builtins... (cached) yes
checking whether the compiler provides atomic builtins for 64 bit data
types... no
I explicitly turned off the atomic builtins and no luck there, either.
Let me know what else you'd like me to try.
thx
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com
