> -----Original Message----- > From: Rory Toma [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:21 AM > To: Rainer Gerhards > Cc: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Question on host failover > > The one I gave you was set up to fail over. > > I blocked port 110, so it should failover to 143. It's not. It's as if > it never gets to the rule, or it isn't parsing it. I watch my tcpdump > and it just keeps retrying on port 110. I gave you the debug log with > this setup and it never gets to the failover rule, which, is probably > the problem.
Sorry, I did not see the message, so I did a re-check. You are right, there was one, which I overlooked :( The debug instrumentation for that case is bad in 5.8.1. I think I have improved it with my recent patch series. > > So, given that, what do I do? Please apply the recent patches (or even better use the git v5-stable branch) and submit a new debug log. Hopefully this will have sufficient debug information. Besides that, I need the new version to see where the patch series still fails. Thanks, Rainer > > On 6/16/11 11:09 PM, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback. So I now need a debug log. Please make sure > that it > > includes both the startup as well as a sample message flow where the > problem > > occurs. > > > > Rainer > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Rory Toma [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 12:51 AM > >> To: Rainer Gerhards > >> Cc: rsyslog-users > >> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Question on host failover > >> > >> On 6/15/11 11:28 PM, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Rory Toma [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:58 PM > >>>> To: Rainer Gerhards > >>>> Cc: rsyslog-users > >>>> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Question on host failover > >>>> > >>>> So, if I check out the bug, the syntax that you have marked as > >> "works" > >>>> is what does *not* work for me. > >>> Wait until that bug is fixed and let's see if what you see is a > side- > >> effect > >>> or not. If it doesn't sole the issue, we can always look at the > next > >> one... > >>> Rainer > >> I tried out the two patches that you posted on the bug. No change > for > >> me. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
