Have your turned off name resolution for a test? Why not use 5.8.6?

rainer

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Gaurav Kumar
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:33 AM
> To: rsyslog-users
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] udp forwarding performance
> 
> Hi Rainer,
> I am now running version 5.8.1. I was running into rate-limiting issues
> so
> I've set following-
> $IMUXSockRateLimitInterval 0
> $SystemLogRateLimitInterval 0
> 
> After this, the sender host is sending only about 300-400 messages,
> then
> dropping a lot of them (literally thousands). I ran Wireshark to
> confirm
> whether if it is receiver's issue or sender's and found that indeed
> sender
> is not sending messages.
> 
> Can you please suggest which directives I should set in config to
> troubleshoot this?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gaurav
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Rainer Gerhards
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Gaurav Kumar
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:49 AM
> > > To: rsyslog-users
> > > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] udp forwarding performance
> > >
> > > Thanks Rainer!
> > > I am using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and 4.2.0 is the version which gets
> install
> > > by
> > > apt-get. I will try to install newer version.
> > >
> > > BTW, what should be the expected performance (messages/sec) for
> sending
> > > and
> > > receiving messages over UDP?
> >
> > Wiht v6 > 500k/second, but you possibly need to enable realtime
> priority in
> > order for the OS to know that rsyslog must be sufficiently often
> activated.
> > This number assumes lightweight processing (no database inserts or
> such).
> >
> > Try first without realtime.
> >
> > Rainer
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > > Gaurav
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Rainer Gerhards
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > >
> > > > I guess your problem is rooted in name resolution. A full blown
> DNS
> > > cache
> > > > has
> > > > only recently been introduced in v6. Previous version had limited
> > > caching,
> > > > which usually works well, but not in all cases. Also 4.2.0 is
> *way
> > > > outdated*,
> > > > so probably the issue (if it is one rooted in code) may be solved
> by
> > > > running
> > > > the current 4.8.6 version.
> > > >
> > > > HTH
> > > > Rainer
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > > > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Gaurav Kumar
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:40 AM
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: [rsyslog] udp forwarding performance
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > I am wondering if anybody has performance testing numbers for
> > > rsyslog
> > > > > forwarding (using UDP) ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently, I am forwarding all of my rsyslog messages from one
> host
> > > to
> > > > > another host (also running rsyslog). Both hosts are running
> version
> > > > > 4.2.0.
> > > > > I am seeing throughput of about 2k-3k messages/second on
> receiver.
> > > If I
> > > > > try
> > > > > to send more messages from sender, I find that receiver's
> rsyslog
> > > is
> > > > > dropping logs. Both hosts share same virtual network with
> network
> > > > > latency
> > > > > of just about 1-2 ms. Both hosts have 2 virtual CPUs and 2 GB
> RAM.
> > > > >
> > > > > As per http://blog.gerhards.net/2008/10/rsyslog-
> performance.html it
> > > > > seems
> > > > > that rsyslog is capable of performing processing 100k
> > > messages/second.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can someone please clarify that this number (100k) is for local
> > > syslog
> > > > > messages only? (as opposed to receiving 100k messages/second
> over
> > > > > network)
> > > > >
> > > > > My intent is to find out what is the expected number of
> messages
> > > that
> > > > > rsyslog can forward to other rsyslog host? (assuming average
> host
> > > spec-
> > > > > dual core, 2 GB RAM)
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Gaurav
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > rsyslog mailing list
> > > > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > > > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rsyslog mailing list
> > > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rsyslog mailing list
> > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsyslog mailing list
> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/

Reply via email to