> ----- Original Message ----- > > Sorry, it looks like I didn't make myself clear. I honestly believe > > in standards, after all this is why I spent 10+ years working on > > them ;) I was, however, under the impression that lumberjack does > > not have a final (enough) spec. I guess I took a little to less > > attention after spring. I need to refresh that. One main reason for > > the opinion was that lumberjack was supposed to follow CEE and CEE > > currently f*cks off on exactly the same questions which we > > considered solve (the n-th time;)) end of last year. > > Yeah, the CEE situation is problematic. As for Lumberjack, there is at > least one existing project that follows the current spec (libumberlog); > that's not enough to call the spec stable, but it, I think, a good > enough reason to avoid unnecessary differences.
I made a quick commit to master branch, but need check for regressions (soon). Just so that you know ;) Rainer > > > I still think it is useful to give the end user the ability to > > specify a different container. If he does, he (hopefully) knows what > > he's doing. > > > > Are we in agreement? > > Yes, adding an option is very reasonable. > Mirek _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
