> > If omoracle does not work, would it make sense to try omlibdbi? In > > theory it should work with oracle, but I have not test environment at > > all to try this out. > > One problem with omlibdbi is that I believe that it doesn't do any > batching, it also disables all transactions on the database server, so > you > end up sacraficing a lot of the reliability that you are probably > expecting to get from using a database in the first place.
I thought a bit about this. It's kind of a hen-egg problem: nobody uses the module (because it lacks features), so I am not motivated to work on it (and this it won't receive new features). We also discussed this internally, and we hope to break that cycle. Actually, I could envision that omlibdbi could become the feature-richest database plugin. Assuming libdbi is not a performance problem (what I think), we could consolidate all those specialized db plugins into a single one of superior quality. You'll see work going on in the 7.3.x branch (to be started soon). Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
