As per our discussion over the last couple of days - I plan on using this mode! I'll let you know how it goes and if it ends up fitting me use case as I think it will.
Brian On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Rainer Gerhards <rgerha...@hq.adiscon.com>wrote: > > is anybody actively using this mode? I have strong plans to drop it in > > v7, as it looks like a not-worked-out experiment without any legacy. We > > can clean up the code (and save future work) if we can remove that > > mode. The new JSON passing mode can handle the same use cases (and > > better as the JSON mode has field names!) that the array passing mode > > was meant for. > > > > If I don't hear of any actual use, I'll drop that mode. > > Sorry fort he noise, I overlooked omoracle, which does use that mode. So > it needs to stick, at least for a while... > > Rainer > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
