Good morning!

I'm looking forward to working with everyone on this. I would ask, if you have 
a documentation suggestion but don't have the time to edit the documentation 
yourself in rsyslog-doc, feel free to email the distro with [docs] in the 
subject line. That will call it out to me so I can file the email for 
processing.

Rainer and I have been speaking. I'll loop everyone else in. I'm currently 
working on cleaning up conversion errors in the existing documentation. (Thanks 
Mike for pointing out pandoc. Saved me a huge amount of time.) Once I finish 
that I'll be completing the config and theme work for Sphinx. This is required 
to make sure the HTML output works as expected. As part of this I'm also going 
to be finishing the creation of the Sphinx man page output. The goal of this is 
to have it result in usable man pages that are broken down enough to be easy to 
navigate and still functional.

I may create some git branches for each of the output types so that individuals 
can pull then, test them and give comments on their usability. I'll keep 
everyone apprised.

-- James
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards [[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 4:14 AM
To: rsyslog-users
Subject: [rsyslog] doc project

All, David,

I start a new thread because I a) think it's easier to spot what it really
is about and b)  I could not locate David's last message quickly enough ;)

I have asked James to create an rsyslog-doc project. It's now up on github:

    https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog-doc

I understand David's concerns on the doc correctness. But I admit that I
would probably become a major blocker for the doc work if I would
necessarily require a review each time (especially as I will be heading for
vacation by the end of the week and I will most like only react to
emergencies for two weeks while I am away).

Also, I think that the doc is much less critical in sense of security, and
even correctness. Every now and then I run over things that are incorrect
in the current doc set as well (because I did it wrongly, I explained
something wrongly to someone who documented it, or best practices have
changed over time).

The current doc is a mess, at best usuable for folks that already know what
to look for. I'd assume any change is an improvement. I also trust James,
who is also a long-term list member, with doing serious work on the doc --
just look at the first results.

James has also accepted to act as a maintainer for the doc set, something I
am extremely happy with. David, if you like and have the time, I am sure
all of us would be extremely glad if you could join in into this effort
(BTW: it's extremely seldom that you are not right - and sometimes you
correct me when I overlooked things, so... ;)).

For the time being, I will make doc updates both the the rsyslog repo as
well as the rsyslog-doc one. When I am back from vacation (and hopefully
the rsyslog-doc has reached a good state), I'll remove the doc from rsyslog
repo and begin to use rsyslog-doc for that. I am sure we'll get into some
trouble spots, but what do we have to lose? At worst, we can integrate
rsyslog-doc back into rsyslog, and make me accept contributions as of now.
But I think by keeping it separate, we can attrack a much bigger crowd (as
it becomes easier to contribute).

Comments welcome.
Rainer
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to