15.12.2013 23:09, David Lang:
ii) *don't even bother with the old-style config*. Double the effort,
triple the confusion. Even right now, everything supported (7.x and
later)
works with new-style config. We tell everyone to upgrade, so it makes
sense
to concentrate on the new stuff that we consider better.
sometimes it's much easier to do the old-style config, and there are a
lot of docs out there with the old style (not to mention configs), we
need people to be able to understand what these existing docs and
configs are talking about. As well as how to convert from one style to
the other.
Old-style config should be obsolete, and it's a pity if they are so much
easier, that it justifies mixing them with new-style. This is not to say
that old-style should not be documented. Obviously, if they are
supported, they need to be documented. But users should feel encouraged
to use just one, hopefully newer, dialect. This can be reached by
following some rules in docs. Something like this:
- When describing a feature, use only newer syntax;
- Then list all mappings from older to newer syntax separately, with
examples, to make migration simpler.
--
Pavel Levshin
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
