I haven't tested this yet, but is there any reason why IncludeConfig
wouldn't work encapsulated within an ruleset () {} ?I ask because I'm interested in segmenting out a few extremely large ruleset files I presently have into much smaller more manageable (for us) sub configs/rulesets. I'd assume this works but am not currently near my lab and I'd love to hear any caveats or challenges to this type of approach if anyone has any. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
