Hi, Florian Riedl wrote: > we have just released v1.0.1 of liblogging. This version primarily > clarifies the licensing and fixes some packaging issues. Otherwise, it is > identical to 1.0.0.
Should v1.0.1 represent the implementation of the new name scheme announced in <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.rsyslog/12822/focus=12833>? I am wondering because the SO name is still "liblogging" and not "liblogging1" and the README.md sounds like the package maintainer should take care for the renaming -- that's not what I (and hopefully others) expected from the "Feedback request: liblogging component names" thread. -Thomas _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
