2014-10-31 0:38 GMT+01:00 David Lang <da...@lang.hm>: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > >>> >>> +1 for a time-based release approach. >>> >>> >> I am not sure if David and you talked about the same thing. If I >> understood >> David correctly (please correct me if I am wrong), he says that we release >> versions (88 to avoid confusion with existing versions), e.g. 88.6.1, >> 88.6.2, 88.6.3, 88.6.x whenever they are ready. However, every 6 month we >> would begin a new series, e.g. 88.7.1. From then on, only 88.7 is updated. >> > > I'm actually thinking of the kernel model > > every X months release 88.7, 88.8, 88.9, etc. If there are bugfixes that > need to go out between the X month releases, they become 88.7.1 88.7.2 etc. > 3-6 months seems to work fairly well for individual projects. In between > people can just compile from the master. I don't think we have enough > testing participation to go the -rcX route. > > If there is a major (risky) change, it would justify an 89 release, but > that would end up being something like a re-write of the queue model or > other very intrusive (and therefor risky) change, not the ongoing features, > modules, performance optimizations. > > mmhh... isn't that -except for the timing- what we do with the current -devel/-stable just in other terms? I agree that terms are important but should we than name the master branch releases as stable and the monthly as "old stable". Also, I have the impression that with the kernel almost everyone uses the bi-annually releases (in our words the -stable) and not the master.
If I am not wrong, that model would probably result in the same problem, that is I develop new things in master branch, but everyone begins to "test" them when it is rolled into the bi-annually releases. Am I overlooking something here? Rainer David Lang > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
