2015-12-05 14:27 GMT+01:00 Peter Portante <[email protected]>: > Hi Folks, > > I thought I would do a quick experiment using -Wstack-usage=4096 to see > what showed up. There are not many routines using more than 4K, but there > are two using 128K or more. > > Here is a gist with the results: > https://gist.github.com/portante/6344ccdca306779d8e14
For all interested, please read the begin of the story: https://github.com/rgerhards/rsyslog/commit/455508b499ac150b70521a5bc0b3d10a565f65d2#commitcomment-14794549 These 128K buffers on stack make a lot of sense as they prevent malloc/free calls. Rainer > > Kind regards, -peter > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of > sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T > LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
