2015-12-17 16:47 GMT+01:00 Thomas D. <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I agree with Michael. > > While I understand Rainers concerns in general this is different: For > you there are only test files missing. But for distributions there is no > working v8.15 release (tests are really important for us).
Can't you apply a patch? I remeber well in that long discussion over a year ago that you were on of the strong proponents of "it's easy to patch if something is a small nit"? I just want to understand that change of position, if it is one. Remember that we held much more serious things (like a non-working imfile) because of this policy. If that policy is wrong, the whole idea with 6-week releases is wrong (I admit that was my mayor concern at that time, and you all convinced me and so I now wonder what's going on...). Rainer > > So you don't push a code bugfix, you just push a fixed tarball. Because > you can't just re-release 8.15.0 you have to release a new revision. > Something like 8.15.0.1 (I wouldn't go for 8.15.1). > > > -Thomas > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of > sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T > LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
