2016-01-25 15:02 GMT+01:00 Thomas D. <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > very good idea! > > My x86 and x64 build cluster finished without any problems: > > > > ============================================================================ > > Testsuite summary for rsyslog 8.16.0 > > > ============================================================================ > > # TOTAL: 182 > > # PASS: 174 > > # SKIP: 8 > > # XFAIL: 0 > > # FAIL: 0 > > # XPASS: 0 > > # ERROR: 0 > > > For future please also release the doc tarball. > > I am not sure about the URL/filename. If we would detect a breakage > would we skip the intended version (i.e. 8.16.0 in this case) and > release 8.16.1 instead? Then it would be fine... > > I think I see your point. So future candidates should go into a dedicated directory. I think that should solve all issues, right?
With the next release, I'll see that I can get the tarball candidate (including doc) up by Monday morning, or maybe even Friday into a dedicated directory. Does that address your needs? Rainer > > -Thomas > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
