On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 07:57:27 +0300
From: Eugene Prokopiev <[email protected]>
Reply-To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Queues problems
2016-03-16 20:08 GMT+03:00 David Lang :
you can also create a ruleset and put a queue on the ruleset with the new
syntax, then put the postgres output in that ruleset. It's not as pretty as
the new action() syntax directly, but it's a lot better than the old queue
syntax.
Can you show me example of such configuration (ruleset with queue and
postgres output)?
ruleset(name="foo" queue.type="fixedarray") {
normal actions here, including postgres output without any queue stuff
}
David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
