It looks like there was work done on the name value parser, but it did not make it to the doc:
https://github.com/rsyslog/liblognorm/issues/33 We should try to add the few missing bits there, as we do not like to add more and more single use parser modules to rsyslog. I understand that this is easiest from a contributor POV, but it's ready bad from the projects POV. As long as you don't need the module merged, any approach is of course fine. Rainer Sent from phone, thus brief. eSX via rsyslog <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 10. Aug. 2018, 23:37: > I prefer to use mmnormalize too. > IMHO, it seems there is no suited method for it? > In other words, I spent more time on mmnormalize than on writing a module > :( > > > > David Lang <[email protected]>于2018年8月11日 周六05:06写道： > > > Rather than creating a new mm module, can you please look to see if this > > can be > > done as an item type in mmnormalize? that is FAR more flexible. > > > > David Lang > > k > > > -- > eSX > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
