As a side-note: we *really* need some help with a couple of issues building on SuSE OBS. We would deeply appreciate if somebody could step in and provide a helping hand. The goal still is to get OBS going to provide cross-platform packages for all distros.
A big problem we currently have is that we cannot build with openssl for debian [1]. This means we have to exclude this functionality from the rsyslog-project debian packages. But it's not only this problem, there are more of the same sort. Even partial answers would help. Thanks, Rainer [1] https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/535202-obs-debian-doesn-t-find-libssl-dev-package El mar., 5 mar. 2019 a las 20:39, Rainer Gerhards (<[email protected]>) escribió: > > Simple: Lack of contributors. I am asking since years for folks who would > like to help with packaging and so far we had 0 responses. Adiscon packages > what the support customers request. But that's basically it. > > I have started with suse obs one or two years ago, so that we get Debian and > suse as well. But it's a real side activity, and so far nobody who knows the > system did step in when I asked. Thankfully Jan has packaged omhttp for what > we have on obs and where we can make it work. Right now, though, the build on > my repo send to but have worked. Hopefully fixed soon. > > Rainer > > Sent from phone, thus brief. > > Derek DiFilippo via rsyslog <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 5. > März 2019, 20:08: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Congrats to Rainer and the team for another great release. >> >> Why was omhttp.so not built/packaged with 8.1903 (or 8.1901 for that >> matter)? >> >> What is the best practice here if I need to use and distribute omhttp? >> >> Build and install it myself into /usr/lib64/rsyslog? I'm wary of doing that >> because it might conflict with a future rsyslog update. >> >> I feel there's a policy/convention I'm missing here. Why not build and >> package all modules? Package size? Licensing? Is the concept that people >> might build/package/install their own custom modules? Wouldn't they be free >> to name the .so differently and then something like >> module(load="mycustomomhttp")? >> >> thanks, >> -Derek. >> _______________________________________________ >> rsyslog mailing list >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog >> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ >> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards >> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of >> sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T >> LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
