Rainer Gerhards wrote > As David says, there is no problem. RFC 5424 references RFC 3339, and > in e.g. Sect. 2 and 4.3 it tells that "Z" and "+00:00" is equivalent. > > See https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt > > Rainer
I think the "problem" is that the user might *want* to use the 'Z' notation and not '+00:00' as it is shorter... Is there any way to force rsyslogd to emit 'Z' without defining custom template? -- Sent from: http://rsyslog-users.1305293.n2.nabble.com/ _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
