you can put a queue on a ruleset and then all your actions in that ruleset.
David Lang On Thu, 18 Sep 2025, Raymond Chang via rsyslog wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:14:43 -0700 From: Raymond Chang via rsyslog <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: Raymond Chang <[email protected]> Subject: [rsyslog] Shared action queues Hi, I've run into issues with local logging being blocked because a different action (omfwd) is blocked. Eventually the main queue filled up and we started dropping messages. I'd prefer it if omfwd actions didn't affect local logging and it seems like adding action queues for omfwd is a good solution for this. However, I'm worried about the overhead of adding a queue for each action (we have a lot). I know I can tune the queue parameters but I'm wondering if all the omfwd actions can just share one queue? Looking at the documentation, I think I can group them into a ruleset and make a ruleset queue but I was wondering if there is a better solution? We're currently on rsyslog version 8.2102.0. Best wishes, Raymond _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
_______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
