Yeah, its not the mappings at all.  It is the permissions for the directory.  Unlike slapd or 2000 AD, 2003 requires an account that had read permission on the directory server for binding.  You can either hack 2003 AD to allow anonymous access, or create a user to do it.

 

-Jay

 

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drew Taylor
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: RE: [rt-users] LDAP working, now the next step

 

Eric,

Thanks for the note. I have Active directory LDAP working here at $work, but I don't know if it's 2000 or 2003. Good to know that MS didn't make it more difficult if you upgrade. :-)

 

Drew

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 2:04 PM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Cc: Drew Taylor
Subject: Re: [rt-users] LDAP working, now the next step


Drew:

I tested against 2000 and 2003 with ldapsearch before posting those settings to http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?LdapAttrMap.  The mapping is the same for both.

--
Eric N. Valor
Information Technology Manager
DaimlerChrysler Research & Technology North America, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1510 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304
CIMS 931-00-00
650-845-2536

: This Space Intentionally Left Blank :




Jay,
Please update the Wiki with the Windows 2003 AD information if you
haven't already done so. I'm curious how your mapping differs from that
on http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?LdapSiteConfigSettings.

Drew


_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com


We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: 
http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html

Reply via email to