Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Toby Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Stefan Hornburg wrote, On 16/04/2008 15:26:
>>
>>> Vivek Khera wrote:
>> >> On Apr 16, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Mike Peachey wrote:
>> >>> I disagree. Distribution packaging systems cause a LOT of RT
>> >>> problems. Manual installation or platform-independent packaging is a
>> >>> much better way of managing RT and using CPAN to perform perl
>> >>> installations is by far the best automatable method.
>> >> Must be crappy packages. The freebsd packages work wonderfully across
>> >> upgrades.
>> >
>> > I also have good experiences with packaged RT. In my case the Debian
>> > packages were easy to install and that saved a lot of work.
>>
>> Agreed, RT on debian's easy. Thank you Niko.
> Except that it's 3.6.x where x < 6 (I think it's still 3.6.1) and when
> users of this package come to list they have less chances to get
> feedback and fixes.
Right, but I think it is still easier to backport it from testing
than installing from scratch.
Regards
Racke
--
LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/
Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration
ICDEVGROUP => http://www.icdevgroup.org/
Interchange Development Team
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
