On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote: > Last time this came up, I found the reference in RFC822 or 2822 that > said that headers weren't technically an ordered list.
Yes, but in practice everyone has shifted away from this. Received header ordering is absolutely necessary for proper spam reporting. > RT doesn't intentionally massage the header order, but either > MIME::Tools or > RT, stores them as a hash at some point.... I'll dig into this. Is there any place that RT stores the original, unaltered message? -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
