Mike Peachey schrieb: > Martin Maurer wrote: > >>> Has anyone tried running RT in a virtual machine? >>> >> yes, we also have a ready to run virtual appliance, >> See http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/RT_Request_Tracker >> > <snip> > >> I am working also with vmware since years (and also other virtualizations >> technologies) and the biggest issue is IO performance. >> We prefer OpenVZ for database intensive servers like RT as we have NO >> virtual disks here you get the best performance. >> >> On VMWare, you got virtual disks which costs performance. So if you want to >> go for VMware, I suggest you invest some money in a fast SAN. >> (Or, if you want to try fast and cost effective virtualization - try Proxmox >> VE) >> >> Just to mention: >> you can also install Proxmox VE inside your VMware and use the virtual >> appliance - then RT performs similar as you install it "by hand" in your >> VMWare environment. >> > > I don't know about anyone else, but I am getting a little uncomfortable > with your posts (to RT-Users and to the Wiki) being little more than an > advert for proxmox rather than a real contribution to the community. > >
Well, it's a fine line... > I'm not saying I don't want you mentioning it, but I personally would > appreciate it if you could tone down the advertising. > Personally, I don't mind. But I know that you can get carried away if you have built something and it works... I do use Virtuozzo (the commercial version of OpenVZ), but I'm not sure I would trust it with RT ;-) OTOH, it's mostly because I like the way perl-stuff is handled in FreeBSD. Rainer _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
