>What platform are you running RT on? On RHEL the default Apache
>installation is sufficient.
In my particular case, it's OpenBSD 4.5. But I'm bulidng Apache-2.2.11 from
source, so I'm comparing my modules list against the default in the Apache
source build itself. I'm just trying to pare it down (default is about 30 and
I'm down to about half).
So far, I've managed to reduce it down to the following, and I've had no
complaints:
rt:bin {102} ./httpd -l
Compiled in modules:
core.c
mod_authn_file.c
mod_authz_host.c
mod_authz_user.c
mod_auth_basic.c
mod_log_config.c
mod_env.c
mod_setenvif.c
prefork.c
http_core.c
mod_mime.c
mod_status.c
mod_asis.c
mod_info.c
mod_dir.c
mod_so.c
The only reason I need authn_file, authz_host, authz_user, and auth_basic is
because I need CAS logins (mod_auth_cas, which is LoadModule'd.) I don't know
if all these auth* modules are required, if I was using the built-in RT-based
user authentication system. I have status/info only for a short time while I
monitor it and they'll both eventually be removed.
I think I probably need dir and mime, but I'm not sure about env/setenvif/asis.
I realize I'm kinda hitting the point of diminshing returns at this point, but
it's just something I figure I'd try and ask about.
PH
PS
Incidentally, some of the Tuning tips on
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/PerformanceTuning work really well.
Especially, the MasonStaticSource true, and MasonEnableAutoflush true
directives worked well for us. We were using a recent build of
DBIx::SearchBuilder and HTML::Mason, but if your system isn't, I'd highly
recommend updating those two modules if possible.
Paul Hirose wrote:
> In short, is there a list of the absolute minimum modules required for Apache
> 2.2.11 in order to support RT 3.8.3 when using MySQL 5.1.34 (all on the same
> single server), when used in a fairly default manner.
>
> For example, I'm fairly certain I don't need "userdir" or "imagemap". I also
> don't think I need "alias". I'm not sure about "cgi", I don't think it uses
> the cgi stuff. I don't know exactly what form of auth it uses, but I don't
> think it's any of the auth-dbm or auth-digest, etc.
>
> As always, I'm just trying yet again to streamline my RT operation and
> experience.
>
> Thank you,
> PH
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: sa...@bestpractical.com
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
