On 09/22/2009 08:05 AM, Jesse Vincent wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 07:15:09PM -0700, Behzad Mahini wrote: >> I have done a fresh installation of RT 3.8.4, and have done no >> modifications of any sort to the default installation.....and was >> preparing to do my database backup (using mysqldump),and noticed the >> only table that has a MyISAM engine is the 'Sessions' Table (the rest >> are all InnoDB as expected). >> >> My understanding is that all of these tables were to have been of the >> InnoDB engine type (RT's transaction-based requirements/ >> recommendations). >> >> 1) Is this by design, or due to an unresolved bug? > Closer to the former than the latter. > What are the benefits of the Sessions table being MyISAM now that InnoDB read/write throughput is in most cases superior to MyISAM?
Micah
