On 29/06/2016 at 06:34:58 +0200, fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel wrote : > > > On 24.06.2016 21:14, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Alexandre Belloni > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 22/06/2016 at 08:42:20 +0200, Dirk Behme wrote : > >>> From: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> ... and Epson RX8900 real time clock > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]> > >>> Cc: [email protected] > >>> --- > >>> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/epson,rx8900.txt | 22 > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/epson,rx8900.txt > >>> > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/epson,rx8900.txt > >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/epson,rx8900.txt > >>> new file mode 100644 > >>> index 0000000..3f61e51 > >>> --- /dev/null > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/epson,rx8900.txt > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ > >>> +Real Time Clock driver for: > >>> + - Epson RX8900 > >>> + - Micro Crystal rv8803 > >>> + > >>> +Required properties: > >>> +- compatible: should be: "microcrystal,rv8803" or "epson,rx8900" > >>> +- reg : the I2C address of the device for I2C > >>> + > >>> +Optional properties: > >>> +- epson,vdet-disable : boolean, if present will disable voltage detector. > >>> + Should be set if no backup battery is used. > >> > >> I guess we need to make that one generic. I would use > >> voltage-detection-disable. > >> > >> Andrey, can you use that one instead of > >> dallas,disable-oscillator-stop-flag ? > >> > > > > AFAIU from reading RX8900 datasheet, it has two power rails main and a > > backup one, so setting this property disables circuitry responsible > > for detecting main power rail failure and switching to a backup one. > > > > DS1341 has only one power rail and setting > > "dallas,disable-oscillator-stop-flag" will disable circuitry > > responsible for detection of failure of the oscillator ticking its > > internal clock. > > > > IMHO, those functionalities don't have much in common and using the > > same property would be confusing for users of that binding on DS1341, > > but it's a boolean so there's not technical reason I couldn't. > > Should i still replace epson,vdet-disable to voltage-detection-disable?
No, Andrey is right. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
