On 07/05/2016 10:46 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Krzsztof,
>
> On 07/05/2016 12:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/04/2016 01:03 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> At the end of s3c_rtc_probe(), s3c_rtc_disable_clk() being called
>>> with rtc
>>> clock already disabled, which looks extra and unnecessary call.
>>> Lets clean it up.
>>
>> Does not look right. Till that place, the clocks are enabled. Then
>> s3c_rtc_setaie() is called which expects that clocks are disabled...
>> otherwise counters get mixed.
>>
>
> The clock is always disabled when it reach s3c_rtc_setfreq() in probe(),
> because s3c_rtc_gettime() will always disable the clock.
>
> As far as s3c_rtc_setaie() is concern, it enables clock while entering
> and disables it while leaving the function. And in
> s3c_rtc_{enable,disable}_clk() there is check info->clk_disabled flag
> which will make sure clock balancing.
Ah, you're right. Looks correct although the information that clock is
disabled because of s3c_rtc_gettime() would be useful in the commit message.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rtc-linux+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
