Peng Fan wrote:
2013/5/31 Chris Johns <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
I am still wondering if we need locals in the RAP file. Could some
form of incremental linking pass in rtems-ld remove them ?
I am not sure whether using specific gcc options can remove this or not.
The options used by gcc should not effect what happens. We need to
handle there being local symbols.
I think if use specific options to remove them, there should be a lot
work to be done to resolve the symbol table, strtab and reloc part of
the linker.
I am not sure how much work there is to remove them. I am currently just
wondering why they exist and if it is possible to remove them.
I want to use my current implementation to implement the
other archs for loader just following the schedule in my proposal
,because the rtl-mdreloc-(arch).c is relatively independent to the
symbols part. Any advice?
Yeap the arch specific code is not related to this issue and working on
it as planned is a good idea.
The c code in file 3.c :
Thanks. I will take a closer at soon.
Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
