The i386 is a bit special since x86 is the GCC main stream architecture. I
asked this out of curiosity. Is there really some working i386 hardware around
with RTEMS on it?
On 2013-08-12 13:52, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I don't care about the i386 in particular but no on addressed my concern about
setting a precedent for other architectures such as m68k which may not have
desirable instructions in low models. Even SPARC V7 is questionable if you must
have atomic instructions to stay in GCC.
Sebastian Huber <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
there was some lobbying against the deprecation of the i386 support of GCC:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-12/msg00132.html
Is this really justified? Why does the RTEMS project need the i386? We should
not make the life of GCC developers harder than necessary.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : [email protected]
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : [email protected]
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
