On 2013-12-14 19:32, Joel Sherrill wrote:
HiThe failures on sis on the head indicate a few that need some attention. WARNING - heapwalk did not appear to complete execution create a loop in the free list ../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../testsuites/libtests/heapwalk/init.c: 55 retval == expectet_retval
In case RTEMS_DEBUG is enabled, then this is ok.
WARNING - mrfs_fstime did not appear to complete execution Sleep a few seconds ../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../testsuites/fstests/mrfs_fstime/../fstime/test.c: 128 st.st_ctime == st.st_mtime
This is a TODO for the RFS.
WARNING - sp2038 did not appear to complete execution I think this is expected.
Yes, this needs a 64-bit time_t.
WARNING - spintrcritical20 did not appear to complete execution *** TEST INTERRUPT CRITICAL SECTION 20 *** This looks like recent changes may have broken things or the assertion is not really guaranteed all the time.
I think this is a problem with the test. I see sporadic failures here.
Support - rtems_timer_create - creating timer 1 ../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../testsuites/sptests/spintrcritical20/init.c: 139 ctx->thread_queue_was_null WARNING - sppagesize did not appear to complete execution Known failure until tools adjusted.
-- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : [email protected] PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
