On 23/02/2014 8:32 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 02/22/2014 10:49 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
- status = rtems_io_register_name( console_name, major, i+1);
+ rtems_io_register_name( console_name, major, i+1);
Why is the result not checked ?
Its not checked since day one of this file.
Sure but this is no reason not to add a check rather than remove the
assignment.
I suppose its not critical
if you can't register these device files (in contrast to
"/dev/console"). If the application uses these missing device files,
then it may do smarter things than we can do here.
Yeah this is true and a good point. Maybe adding the check and failing
would break existing applications.
Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
