Ok... I see what you were saying now. Calling the pthread_attr_setaffinity_np from pthread_setaffinity_np seemed like overkill, when it was just one line added to the pthread_attr_setaffinity_np method.
> -----Original Message----- > From: rtems-devel-boun...@rtems.org [mailto:rtems-devel- > boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Jennifer Averett > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:31 AM > To: Gedare Bloom > Cc: rtems-devel@rtems.org > Subject: RE: Patch for pthread get and set affinity > > I'm sorry I don't follow this question. This patch is the Implementation and > test of pthread_attr_setaffinity_np. > Am I missing something? The method sets the api->Attributes affinity. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ged...@gwmail.gwu.edu [mailto:ged...@gwmail.gwu.edu] On > Behalf > > Of Gedare Bloom > > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:17 AM > > To: Jennifer Averett > > Cc: rtems-devel@rtems.org > > Subject: Re: Patch for pthread get and set affinity > > > > Same comments from my email on the other thread apply here. Why don't > > you use the pthread_attr_setaffinity_np() to set the api->Attributes > affinity? > > -Gedare > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Jennifer Averett > > <jennifer.aver...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > > > > > > Attached are patches for pthread get and set affinity, as well as a > > > test for the new functions. > > > > > > Jennifer Averett > > > On-Line Applications Research > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rtems-devel mailing list > > > rtems-devel@rtems.org > > > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtems-devel mailing list > rtems-devel@rtems.org > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel