Ahh, ok.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Jennifer Averett <[email protected]> wrote: > I dug into this one a little more and on that path the object isn't > found so there is no reason to call put. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Gedare Bloom >> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:18 AM >> To: Jennifer Averett >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: pthread get attribute >> >> In case of an error ESRCH, shouldn't there be an _Objects_Put() call before >> returning? >> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Jennifer Averett >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Attached is the modified pthread get attribute patch and its >> > corresponding test. >> > >> > >> > Jennifer Averett >> > On-Line Applications Research >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rtems-devel mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel >> > _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
