Joel, Around line 547 of the patch it appears to be adding an unconditional define in confdefs.h for +#define CONFIGURE_CONFDEFS_DEBUG
Please justify or remove. Otherwise, the patch looks good to me. Do you have any idea what the effect of this patch is on the code, data, and workspace size? Gedare On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > Hi > > I think all comments have been addressed. Tests run in uniprocessor > configuration with POSIX enabled and disabled. > > confdefs.h debug updated > > -- > Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development > joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research > Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 > Support Available (256) 722-9985 > > > _______________________________________________ > rtems-devel mailing list > rtems-devel@rtems.org > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel > _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
