On 8/03/2014 3:45 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
This will make the protected Chain API stuck (for now, possibly
forever) with coarse-grained locks,

Yeap.

but users can define their own
fine-grained locking implementations of chains using unprotected chain
API calls?

Working is the first thing then working better can be done by users as they need based on their profiling.

I think this is acceptable.

I agree.

Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel

Reply via email to