On 8/03/2014 3:45 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
This will make the protected Chain API stuck (for now, possibly forever) with coarse-grained locks,
Yeap.
but users can define their own fine-grained locking implementations of chains using unprotected chain API calls?
Working is the first thing then working better can be done by users as they need based on their profiling.
I think this is acceptable.
I agree. Chris _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel