On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Sebastian Huber <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2014-03-31 16:15, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> bcc: rtems-users >> >> Sebastian, >> >> Any thought on whether we can resolve this problem of threads holding >> resources by way of something similar to the discussion about solving >> the "strict order mutex" / nested mutex acquire bug >> https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2124 > > > No, I think this PR2124 is an entirely different issue. > > You have POSIX cleanup handler, POSIX key destructors and thread termination > user extensions to deal with asynchronous thread deletion. I think we > should enable POSIX cleanup handlers for all RTEMS configurations. > What do we need the cleanup handler to deal with when the user does not enable posix?
It starts to feel like we need to re-evaluate the impact on applications if we just enable posix all the time in RTEMS. -Gedare > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : [email protected] > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
