On 2014-04-17 16:04, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 4/16/2014 3:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>Hello Jeff,
>
>I updated the status subsections in the implementation section.
Thanks but I am having trouble still trying to figure out what a short
summary should be. I would like the summary table to have phrases
like:
+ complete
+ basic functionality complete with future enhancements identified
+ no work done
+ in process
+ partially complete
Picking on Low-level start
(http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/SMP#Low-Level_Start)
as an example, the Status is a description of the implementation. Beyond the
single phrase "is guided by" which implies it does it now and no Future
Directions,
the description does not give one a hint as to what state this idea/task
is in.
My idea behind the summary table was to have a "red/green/yellow" view of
everything that was identified at a glance.
No future directions means its green, everything is fine.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
