On 4/06/2014 10:58 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
On 2014-06-04 12:55, Chris Johns wrote:
This is definitely better and we should add this
rtems_shell_dup_current_env(), but I would nonetheless keep the
rtems_global_shell_env for backward compatibility.
Is it feasible to provide a macro for rtems_global_shell_env that
provides the compatibility?
I could not see an easy way with my quick look.
We should definitely put it on the list to eliminate at least after
4.11 (*prod*)
Agreed.
Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
